His legal counsel claimed at the time that the initial trial was unfairly swayed in Emily Doe’s favor by a “lengthy set of lies.” Multhaup has since narrowed his argument to the question of intent.Īt Tuesday’s hearing in California’s 6th District Court of Appeal, Multhaup asserted that Turner only wanted sexual contact while fully dressed. Last December, Turner applied for an appeal. Outrage over the brevity of Turner’s lockup branded the ex-athlete as the face of rape culture and fueled a recall campaign that ousted the judge who sentenced him. Turner, now 22, was convicted in March 2016 of assault with intent to rape an unconscious woman, sentenced in June that year to six months in jail and released in half that time.Īn emotional 7,000-word statement from the victim known only as Emily Doe” vaulted the case into the international spotlight. An attorney for Brock Turner-the former Stanford University swimmer whose few-month jail stay for sexual assault sparked a national conversation about rape culture and judicial discretion-said his client only wanted to have “sexual ‘outercourse’” with his passed-out victim and didn’t “intend” to rape her.Įric Multhaup said as much in court Tuesday while trying to convince a three-judge panel to overturn his client’s sentence to a lifetime status as a registered sex offender, according to news reports.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |